His Bloody Project


, , , ,



His Bloody Project ~ Graeme Macrae Burnet

Excellent. Hooked from the start.

In the late 1800’s, in the remote Highlands of Scotland, a brutal triple-murder takes place and there is no shred of doubt who the killer is. It is nice natured seventeen-year-old Roderick Macrae. How could this have happened? In a small village of a handful of inhabitants, where the gravest of crimes till date were nothing more than petty thievery.

My first impression of the book was reminiscent of sentiments I had when I watched the first episode of Fargo. Graeme Macrae Burnet is a clever writer. He insists that the book is based on real events, on an ancestor of his. Which is furthermore believable given that the protagonist shares the writer’s name. Very clever indeed, because I spent some time initially just trying to figure out if this was true crime or not. I’ll save you the research – it is not. This is entirely a fictional piece of work.

In its historical setting, the book is masterful. The tone is somber and the events unfolding are narrated with forensic precision, devouring you into Roderick’s plight. That is what any writer wants from their book is it not? For the reader to root for the protagonist, despite knowing what they are ultimately capable of.

I am not usually a reader of genre crime fiction, and I commend Burnet and his publishers for marketing the book as that – but it is very far from it. It is very much a literary piece of work, if you are not opposed to using that term.

Why you should read it –

  • For the admirably artistic way that crime can be written
  • I wasn’t once bored as I read the book
  • For the thrill of loving a villain

Why you shouldn’t read it –

  • If you’re looking for a classic whodunnit
  • If you don’t like unresolved bits in the books that you read

Claudine in Paris


, , , , ,


Claudine in Paris ~ Colette 

Those who read my review of Claudine at School know by now just how delighted I was with it. I was quick to get my hands on the whole series and, Claudine in Paris is the second book while continuing to be a sheer joy to read.

Here, Claudine is seventeen and still ruthless and has moved from her sheltered life in Montigny to Paris. Colette’s prose is witty and sparkling, and there wasn’t a single page I didn’t turn without arching my eyebrows. Only in France could this book have been published way back in 1901, although I believe it still did cause quite the stir.

This second book follows a similar theme; with Claudine observing human nature as best she can. Like the first part, this one too is open about homosexuality, while also touching on other such scandalous subjects as sadomasochism and mistresses. I will say however that some parts of the book may be offensive to us modern readers, but what undoubtedly kept me going was how absolutely hilarious Claudine is.

Why you should read it:

  • To peek inside the mind of an early twentieth-century French teenager (the books are partly auto-biographical for that matter)
  • For a quick-witted and breezy read
  • Much juicier than reading mindless clickbait articles online!

Why you shouldn’t read it:

  • If political incorrectness might offend you
  • There are some instances in the book that describe abuse in a (sadly) lighthearted way

A Parisian Affair


, , , , ,


A Parisian Affair ~ Guy de Maupassant 

After a rather long interlude, I decided to go back to the classic short story at the start of this new year. As a teenager, I remember thinking nobody does it better than Maupassant, and so I picked up this collection of thirty-four of his finest.

What struck me most as I re-read these stories, was how much has changed since I read them first. Changed in me, that is. I didn’t finish the stories now feeling entertained. Instead, to my detriment, I kept thinking how some of our modern storytellers would have written them differently. Which didn’t help matters at all. Neither did I enjoy these wonderful stories to the extent I should have nor could I come up with a satisfactory conclusion for their possible improvement.

These stories are fairly short, humorous and strikingly daring for the time they were written in. I know Maupassant, along with others of his time paved the way for the modern short story and these stories no doubt made readers think. Think about changing their thoughts and made them look at the world differently. He wrote psychological thrillers, stories bordering on science fiction, romances and those of profound thought. So to that end, his stories do their job and cannot be faulted.

Why you should read this

  • If you haven’t read any of his stories, this is a good collection to start with
  • The themes are far reaching and cover a range of topics
  • Ultimately, these are excellent stories. Some of the classical best.

Why you shouldn’t read them

  • If you’re looking to be shocked/surprised/affected
  • If you want a page turner

The Sea


, , , , ,


“Perhaps all of life is a long preparation of the leaving of it.”

The Sea ~ John Banville 

This new year, I’ve set a brand new target of reading 50 books which I hope to surpass, and as of now; things are looking good. ‘The Sea’ was a good start to the year and was strangely inspiring for my own writing. I love it when books do that.

I will, however, be doing my followers a disservice if I don’t forewarn that ‘The Sea’ is not for everybody. Banville has received enough criticism already, the internet is awash with it, and I agree; the man is a show-off. However, I do believe that he is a capable one.

‘The Sea’ is a story about an aging man, who, upon the death of his wife, returns to a seaside holiday spot where in his childhood he experienced a tragedy which he now wishes to re-examine. The voice, the pace and the story itself; they all belong to the category of literary fiction which might appeal to readers of such writers as Julian Barnes.

Banville writes calm sentences, very beautifully put together and one can tell that he’s laboured hard at them. He plays interestingly with time, works hard at making the narrator unreliable, stresses less on drama and pays attention to the craft of writing, to making minute observations, using the hardest synonyms in the dictionary…but to my reading tastes, this suits. Despite having predicted the ending.

I’d suggest this book as the perfect Winter-Read.

Why you should read it:

  • If you like slow paced, calm books with strong characters
  • If you’re a fan of Julian Barnes or Graham Swift
  • To strengthen your vocabulary (cheeky)

Why you shouldn’t read it:

  • If you’re in need of a quick holiday read
  • If you don’t want to keep running to the dictionary while reading a book

Claudine at School


, , , , ,


“My name is Claudine, I live in Montigny; I was born there in 1884; I shall probably not die there.” ~ Colette

This is my little Christmas present to you, dear followers of my blog. Not that there is anything remotely Christmas-sy about this book, but I do recommend it from the bottom of my faithful heart.

I came by Claudine at School quite innocently, a tattered copy of it in a second-hand bookshop in Dublin. Upon reading the back, it reminded me of the quite exquisite Bonjour Tristesse and I couldn’t resist.

As it turns out, Claudine at School is only the first of a series of four Claudine novels, and I have already gone and hunted down the others. Such is my desperation to have them all, and so I cannot be happier to review this for my Christmas post.

Claudine at School has at the center of it, Claudine of course, who is but a sixteen-year-old teenage girl in a rural school in the town of Montigny. And no teenage voice has ever been quite as ripe with sensuality, quick witted or as charming before in literature.

It is important to remember that these books were written in the early 1900’s, or perhaps even earlier by Colette under the orders of her husband, who then published them under his own name. They were translated into English, as you may imagine, at a much later date. When it had only started to become acceptable to be caught reading about women’s sexuality in a mass-printed format.

Claudine is beautiful, she is desirable and up to all sorts of mischief with her mates in school. There is sexual tension between the girls, between the staff and the teachers; and Colette isn’t shy to write about them. Needless to say, therefore, that this could very well be one of the earliest and more important books with a strong lesbian narrator.

I cannot praise the book enough for its charm and humour, just read it!

Why you should read it:

  • If you ever enjoyed the more tame Enid Blyton versions such as Malory Towers, The Naughtiest Girl or St. Clare’s; this book is a bit of nostalgia in the same vein meant for an adult audience
  • As a testament to breaking the constraints of time. The book is still relevant today in my opinion

Why you shouldn’t read it:

  • If you intend on reading a book with a likable narrator, Claudine is quite the opposite
  • If the story of teenage girls in a school seems childish to you

The Dark


, , , ,


“I knew them only now when they were lost, I’d loved them without knowing, and only learned of the love in the losing…”

The Dark ~ John McGahern

I was introduced to this book when we read its first page at a workshop, and it had me hooked. From the first words, McGahern was able to mirror the dark, claustrophobic and oppressed world of 1960’s rural Ireland.

The story begins with a father forcing his son to strip for allegedly cursing, bend over a chair and await thrashing, while his siblings watch in terror. It’s a coming-of-age novel, a bildungsroman in its traditional sense but unlike one that you might have read before. The book was banned upon release, forcing McGahern to quit his teaching job and flee to England, for daring to write about the truths of his society. About the hypocrisy of the Irish Catholic church, the violent physical and sexual abuse, incest and the hopeless yearning for freedom.

The book is well written, undoubtedly the work of a master storyteller and a skilled writer. McGahern is able to switch with ease between first, second and third person perspectives within the Chapters, which pleasantly will not throw the reader off.

I implore you to get your hands on this book.

Why you should read it:

  • Because it is an important book, no matter which country you belong to
  • It is a difficult book to read, only for its subject, but one is rewarded with a haunting portrayal of reality

Why you shouldn’t read it:

  • If you might be left squeamish by some graphic scenes of violence or sexual abuse
  • If you’re looking for an easy light read



, , , ,


“It’s easy to tell the dirtiest minds – look for the cleanest fingernails.”

Eileen ~ Ottessa Moshfegh

This book is more of a character study than a novel, with the story or rather the action in the story concentrated solely in the last few pages of the book. Eileen Dunlop is a tightly wound twenty-four-year-old, who spends all her days wallowing in self-pity and self-loathing. She works in the local prison, holding no office of importance. She lives alone with an alcoholic father in a house neither of them have bothered to clean since her mother died five years ago.

Eileen is an extreme. We all dream of a better life, but she derives a certain thrill from her pitiable lot. She is preoccupied with her looks, her physical attributes…she obsesses over a coworker who she believes is the perfect man, and is infatuated by beautiful women. She thieves regularly from shops, drinks heavily with her father, rarely washes and ultimately; the reader will put nothing past her, not even a gruesome crime.

I found it easy to read, especially since I read it less as a story but more as a fascinating case study of a deeply disturbed individual.

Why you should read it:

  • If you like reading books driven by character rather than plot
  • If you like detailed psychological thrillers, or simply psychological studies
  • If you don’t mind reading ugliness on a page

Why you shouldn’t read it:

  • If you’re not prepared to look into the filthy, sexually repressive thoughts of a miserable woman
  • If you’re looking for an action packed read

My Name is Lucy Barton


, , , ,


“Lonely was the first flavor I had tasted in my life, and it was always there, hidden inside the crevices of my mouth, reminding me.”

My Name is Lucy Barton ~ Elizabeth Strout

I will struggle to tell you exactly what this book is about. Relationships, perhaps. Or rather it is like several diary entries of a hugely contemplative person, pieced together. Someone who has yet to make sense of their own life. As I had expected from a novel by Elizabeth Strout, the prose is in elegant style. No frills, no fluff, Strout isn’t trying to make a big show of anything.

Lucy Barton is a mother of two young girls, a budding writer in New York, who comes from hard beginnings. She grew up on a farm, initially living with her family in a garage till they could finally move into a relative’s house. Lucy’s childhood is filled with dread, fear, hunger and loneliness. From those beginnings, she managed to escape. She married a good man, had two girls and for all intents and purposes she is leading an ordinary life. And most of all, she loves her mother.

I should warn you that there isn’t much to the story like I said before, the Chapters are more musings and contemplation than a narrative of plot. It is a gentle book, and has its audience, although I failed to treasure it as much as I would have liked to.

Why you should read it:

  • For its thoughtful message on human character and relationships, on every page
  • For the delicate writing
  • If you like reading introspective books

Why you shouldn’t read it:

  • If you want to read a thrilling story
  • If you like a story with an ending
  • If you don’t want to feel melancholic

The Dinner


, , , ,


The Dinner ~ Herman Koch

I enjoy a good unreliable narrator. It’s the same thrill some people get from watching horror films; I love it when I can’t predict or trust anything that the narrator is telling me. In my opinion, it is one of the strengths of good writing, if a writer can trick a reader into trusting a narrator and then “aha I gotcha”-ing in the last few pages. Plot twists and surprise endings don’t impress me as much, at least not anymore.The Dinner is a book in translation, and yet it does a brilliant job of presenting crisp dialogue, character observations and also trickery.

The story is quite simple. The novel is divided into the four courses of an elaborate fancy dinner, where two couples are doing nothing more than talking. How has Koch managed to write this as a page-turner? I hear you asking, well, therein lies his craft.

I will say though that I enjoyed the first half of the book more; before the real mystery started to be discussed and revealed. I was revelling in the awkwardness of the situation, the banal small talk; you know where two couples are forced to share a meal together despite absolutely hating each others’ company. In the second half, I started to really dislike the characters. I was on the verge of not appreciating the book, till I reminded myself that a good book is not about whether I connect with or am attracted to the characters.

Why you should read it:

  • If you’re looking for your next thrilling page-turner. Think Gone Girl etc.
  • If you’re looking for an enjoyable, humorous and yet shocking book

Why you shouldn’t read it:

  • If you don’t like reading a book where you don’t like any of the characters
  • If your taste doesn’t lie in dark narrative

Mothering Sunday


, , ,


“And was she even a maid? And was he even a master? It was the magic, the perfect politics of nakedness.”

Mothering Sunday ~ Graham Swift

Despite the cover, somehow what I was expecting least from this book was sex. Well, no that is incorrect, I wasn’t expecting the story to begin with sex; the first half of this slight read to contain intimate moments in such great detail. Perhaps I was distracted by the title.

‘Mothering Sunday’ is a romance in some ways, a slice of a larger, more complicated life in others. A seven-year secret love affair has been in the works between Jane Fairchild (a maid) and a wealthy English country gentleman (Paul Sheringham). Paul is soon to be married to a woman of his family’s choosing and this secret love affair is going to end, this very afternoon. The afternoon of Mothering Sunday (Mother’s Day) when all the servants were given the day off to visit their own mothers.

The writing is sublime, moving and had me very close to tears; with this (to borrow from Julian Barnes’ title) sense of an ending. There is a feeling of foreboding from the very beginning, and the novella takes turns that are unexpected. The beauty of this book is that it isn’t only about this one afternoon, but it is written with a structure that narrates Jane Fairchild’s whole life, without complicating it for the reader.

Why you should read it:

  • Quick, yet lazy read. More like a short story rather than a novella
  • Delicate, elevated prose

Why you shouldn’t read it:

  • Most of the story carries on languidly, and to some this might be boring
  • A lot of the writing is more meditation and less story